On Friday we began to look at whether or not capacity management has relevance in a
world of rapidly configurable, cheap hardware.
Let’s consider this further.
There
are five ‘So-called Objectives’ of IT Service Management. These
are ‘so-called objectives’ because they identify an ideal. Reality is very
different.
All ITSM
objectives are important, but the key objective is often forgotten. The
ultimate objective is to increase revenue and
profit and this is its true contribution to the business sphere.
Everybody
concerned with business has to address the twin problems of increasing
productivity while
reducing costs. This is the ultimate goal of ITSM and it is affected by five
main factors:
•
increase productivity
• reduce
costs
• do new
things
• win
competitions
•
provide IT services.
The big
question is how to increase Revenue and Profit and there are two main
strategies:
•
Differentiate yourself from competitors, in order to hold a dominant position
and beat
their
attempts to control the market.
By being
effective in these two areas the company will increase productivity and reduce
costs.
The important point is that
IT service provision can help and support these areas.
Employers’
misgivings about IT investment are in these first two areas and to answer that,
we must explain
how the IT service contributes to the business itself.
It's
important to divide IT services into direct and indirect, as related to
business results. So we should
divide IT into two groups:
• IT
services that influence only internal users within the company.
We then need
to prepare an explanation for management of the degree of contribution that
each IT servicemakes in order to reach the right decisions.
This
brings benefit in that we can prioritize the service level of each IT service
based on the importance to the business, so that then we can control the
service level according to the business priority.
In this way, meaningful
reports can be produced and presented to help in business decision making.
This is
how capacity management becomes proactive and makes a major contribution to the business.Capacity management done reactively and passively is inherently done badly and also makes it seem an overhead to be minimised.
Adam Grummitt
Distinguished Engineer
No comments:
Post a Comment