Tuesday, 24 January 2017

Capacity Management Maturity, Maslow, and You (1 of 7)

This blog series will discuss Capacity Management Maturity from two different viewpoints, although it will quickly become obvious that there are similarities between the two lines of thinking.

First, we’ll look at Capability Maturity Model Integration (or CMMI), a process improvement training and appraisal program that is already at the heart of multiple Capacity Management process assessment and improvement models, including Metron’s.
Next we’ll take a look at Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, which is a theory in psychology proposed by Abraham Maslow in a 1943 paper, which dealt with his theories on human motivation.

While one might think there is little in common between CMMI and Maslow, we’ll dive deeper into the topic and explore whether there is a relationship – and more importantly whether there’s some knowledge we can take away from the exercise.
Finally, we’ll look at ways to interpret Capacity Management Maturity and how to improve it over time.

Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI)

Capability Maturity Model Integration was developed over the last 15 years as a successor to the original Capability Maturity Model, which was developed to improve the usability of maturity models by integrating them into one framework.

•        Process improvement training and appraisal

•        Developed at Carnegie Mellon University

CMMI was originally applied to software development and was sponsored by the US government, but quickly became a way for analysts and organizations to evaluate the maturity of service management and service management processes.
CMMI consists of 5 maturity levels:

  • Initial
  • Managed
  • Defined
  • Quantitatively Managed
  • Optimizing
These levels are well-defined and can be applied to an organization’s service management capabilities and then can be used to drill down into individual ITSM processes.

These levels are especially useful, because they can be well defined in terms that most will understand and accept.

  • Initial – processes are unpredictable, poorly controlled, and chaotic.  Few organizations have processes that fall into this area.
  • Managed – Processes are typically project related and typically reactive
  • Defined – Organizational level processes that are proactice
  • Quantitatively Managed – Processes are measured and controlled
  • Optimizing – Focus is on process improvement
CMMI – Service Management Examples
CMMI can be used to evaluate an organization and the existence and effectiveness of processes can be used to characterize the maturity of the organization.
Capacity Management is considered to be a process at Maturity Level 3 – Defined.  Capacity Management, while having both reactive and proactive focus can only be truly effective if the process is forward looking. 
Some other examples are shown here:
•        Capacity Management – ML3
•        Availability Management – ML3
•        Service Continuity – ML3
•        Service Delivery – ML2
•        Strategic Service Management – ML3
•        Measurement and Analysis – ML2
On Wednesday I’ll look at what Capacity Management Maturity is, in the meantime you might want to sign up to attend our Capacity management Maturity online Workshop running next month.
Rich Fronheiser
Chief Marketing Officer

No comments:

Post a Comment